Some questions for feedback we could think of - please feel free to add more:

1. Is the tagging system the best way to establish links between
people in the corporate and political sphere, and people with
different levels of involvement?

2. Corruption reports are usually very complex and some of the people
'tagged' will only be peripherally involved. Certainly their role
won't be summarised in the first paragraph that we provide. My
question is, without providing a bespoke summary for every person's
involvement (we dont do that at present when reporting) in one
incident or another (i.e. every actor gets a different summary for the
same story) are we just contributing to the chaos?

3. If this is user-run, without a huge Wikipedia-style editor
community it will fail due to misuse of the Wiki. How do we set up
such a community? Is it a good idea at all to have a Wiki?

4. Can anyone suggest a system for dealing with duplicated reports?
What if ten people submit ten different reports about Selebi's arrest?

5. I'd like to hear suggestions for a subheading!

6. Should the front page feature a brief list of most recent
submissions (displaying just the headline, and possible the actors
tags) as well as a featured post which offers headline and first
paragraph?

7. The problem with referring to both Institutions and Incidents is
both start with I, so they can't be referred to by their initial
letter only. Maybe should change institutions to Organsations.

8. Are we on the right track at all?